1. Introduction of the Flexible Use of Airspace Concept in the ECAC Area
    2. 1. Purpose
    3. 2. Background
    4. 3. Basis of the FUA Concept
    5. 4. Conditional Routes (CDRs)
    6. 5. Area Control Centre (ACC)/Flow Management Position (FMP) - CDR Requests
    7. 6. Temporary Segregated Areas (TSAs)
    8. 7. New Airspace-Use Planning Procedures - Approved Agencies (AAs)
    9. 8. Airspace Management Cell (AMC) - Airspace Use Plan (AUP) & Updates (UUPs)
    10. 9. Centralised Airspace Data Function (CADF) - Conditional Route Availability Message (CRAM)
    11. 10. Flight Planning Procedures
    12. List of Abbreviations
    13. 11. Publication of CDRs and TSAs with effect from 28 March 1996
    14. 12. Further Information

 
AIS / Luftfartsinformationstjenesten, Luftfartshuset, P.O.Box 744, Ellebjergvej 50
DK-2450 Copenhagen
SV, Denmark. TEL: 36 44 48 48 / Intl: +45 36 44 48 48
Telex: 27096, FAX: 36 44 03 03 / Intl: +45 36 44 03 03. AFTN: EKCAYAYI
X400: C=DK; A=DK400; P=SLV; S=DCAA; E-mail: dcaa@slv.dk
Home Page
: http://www.slv.dk
Civil Aviation Administration
Statens Luftfartsvæsen
AIC A
14/95
7 DEC
Introduction of the Flexible Use of Airspace Concept in the ECAC Area
1.
Purpose
1.1
The purpose of this Circular is to present initial information as regards the introduction of the Concept of the Flexible Use of Air-
space (FUA) in the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) area with effect from AIRAC date
Thursday 28 March 1996
1.2
The Circular provides information for General Air Traffic (GAT) operators and controllers on the use of new procedures for oper-
ating on non-permanent ATS routes called “Conditional Routes” (CDRs).
1.3
The Circular also provides information for military operators and Operational Air Traffic (OAT) controllers on the new procedures
for operating in flexible airspace structures called “Temporary Segregated Areas” (TSAs) or “AMC-Manageable Restricted (R) or
Danger (D) Areas”.
2.
Background
2.1
In 1990, the ECAC adopted an En-Route Strategy and the European Air Traffic Control Harmonisation and Integration Programme
(EATCHIP).
2.2
In addition to the adaptation of the airspace structure to traffic flows and the implementation of area navigation (RNAV), a major
Airspace Management (ASM) objective of the ECAC Strategy and EATCHIP is the implementation of the FUA Concept. This Con-
cept has been developed by civil and military representatives of ECAC States together with representatives of Aircraft Operators
(AOs).
2.3
The Implementation Plan of the FUA Concept consists of two phases. Phase 1
will start on
28 March 1996
with the progressive
establishment of flexible airspace structures and procedures. The widespread application of the FUA Concept during Phase 2
will
take place from AIRAC date 26 February 1998 onwards.
3.
Basis of the FUA Concept
3.1
The basis of the FUA Concept is that airspace should no longer be designated as either military or civil airspace but should be
considered as one continuum and used flexibly on a day-to-day basis. Consequently, any necessary airspace segregation should
be only of a temporary nature.
3.2
The FUA Concept is based on the possibilities offered by new or adaptive airspace and route structures that are particularly suited
for temporary allocation and utilisation, namely non-permanent ATS routes called “Conditional Routes” (CDRs), “Temporary Seg-
regated Areas” (TSAs) and “AMC-Manageable R or D Areas”.
AIC A-14/95. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
In 1990 it was agreed upon, as a part of the ECAC strategy to in-
troduce a programme designed to make use of airspace more
flexible. Since then Phase 1 of the programme named "The Con-
cept of the Flexible Use of Airspace" is now ready for im-
plementation.
Implementation of Phase 1 is planned for
28 MAR 1996
.
The basis of the FUA Concept is that no airspace should be re-
served in advance for one operator without co-ordination. Mili-
tary/civilian co-ordination is to be improved to fully exploit the
individual airspace segments. For this purpose national Air-
space Management Cells will be established, tasked with the su-
pervision of allocation of individual airspace segments as
required, and to notify the utility of these to EUROCONTROL
Central Flow Management Unit (CFMU).
In Denmark traffic is handled according to the Area Control Con-
cept, characterized by a total exploitation of the airspace, there-
fore, it has been decided
not
to implement FUA Phase 1 in its
entirety.
Therefore, FUA in Denmark will only be introduced in areas
where conditions will be improved for all operators or in areas
where a greater uniformity is preferable.
The Danish Civil Aviation Administration will closely monitor the
FUA Concept and will continuously evaluate requirements (ad-
vantages/disadvantages) as regards a further implementation.
(FO)
AIC A-14/95. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA).
I 1990 blev man som en del af ECAC strategien enige om at
iværksætte et program der har til formål at gøre brugen af luftrum
mere fleksibel. Man er nu kommet så langt at man er klar med
første del af programmet, der benævnes "The Concept of the
Flexible Use of Airspace".
Implementeringen af fase 1 er planlagt til den
28 MAR 1996
.
FUA går ud på, at intet luftrum skal kunne være forhåndsreser-
veret til en enkelt bruger uden koordination. Militær/civil koordi-
nation skal udbygges således at de enkelte luftrumsenheder
udnyttes optimalt. Til dette formål etableres nationale "Airspace
Management Cell's", der har til opgave at styre tildelingen af de
enkelte luftrumsenheder efter behov, samt at meddele anvende-
ligheden af disse til EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management
Unit (CFMU).
I Danmark afvikles trafikken efter et Area Control Concept, som
kendetegnes ved en total udnyttelse af luftrummet, derfor er det
blevet besluttet
ikke
at implementere FUA fase 1 fuldt ud.
I Danmark vil FUA derfor kun blive indført på de områder hvor det
vil forbedre forholdene for alle brugere eller på områder hvor en
større ensartethed vil være at foretrække.
Statens Luftfartsvæsen vil følge FUA konceptet nøje og vil lø-
bende vurdere behovet (fordele / ulemper) for en yderligere im-
plementering.
(FO)

 
AIC A-14/95 - Page 2
DENMARK
7 DEC
DANMARK
3.3
The introduction of the FUA Concept in each of the ECAC States has started with the establishment of a national high-level air-
space policy body. This body is tasked with the re-assessment of national airspace, the progressive
establishment of new flexible
airspace structures and the introduction of procedures for the allocation of these airspace structures on a day-by-day basis. The
States will establish adequate real-time civil/military co-ordination facilities and procedures so as to fully exploit the FUA Concept.
3.4
The application of the FUA Concept will include the setting-up
of national Airspace Management Cells (AMCs), for the daily allo-
cation and promulgation
of flexible airspace structures, and on the establishment of the Centralised Airspace Data Function
(CADF) within the EUROCONTROL Central Flow Management
Unit (CFMU). The CADF will disseminate the daily availability of
Conditional Routes (CDRs) to aircraft operators.
4.
Conditional Routes (CDRs)
4.1
The current “permanent” ATS route network consists of all permanently designated
routes which are not subject to daily manage-
ment and which can only be closed under specific conditions known well in advance e.g
. by NOTAM, for large scale military ex-
ercises.
4.2
Conditional Routes (CDRs) are designed
to complement the permanent ATS route network and to allow flights to be planned on
ATS routes, or portions thereof, that are not always available. CDRs are
generally established through areas of potential tempo-
rary allocation identified under the
generic term “AMC-Manageable Areas” (TSAs and Manageable Restricted/Danger Areas).
4.3
CDRs are divided into three different categories
according to their foreseen availability, their flight planning potential and the an-
ticipated level of activity of the associated AMC-Manageable
Area(s).
4.4
A CDR can be established in one or more
of the three following categories:
4.4.1 Category
One (CDR 1) - Permanently Plannable CDR during the times published in AIPs
-
CDRs 1 are CDRs expected to be available for most of the time during the time period published in AIPs.
-
CDRs 1 will be flight
planned in the same way as permanent ATS routes during the times published in AIPs.
-
Any foreseen unavailability of CDRs 1 will, when practicable, be properly notified.
-
In the event of a short notice unavailability of a CDR 1, re-routing
around an associated AMC-Manageable Area will be
made on ATC instructions.
4.4.2 Category
Two (CDR 2) - Non-Permanently Plannable CDR -
-
CDRs 2 are part of pre-defined routing
scenarios which respond to specific capacity imbalances.
-
Flights
may only be planned on CDRs 2 in accordance with conditions published daily.
4.4.3 Category
Three (CDR 3) - Not Plannable CDR -
-
CDRs 3 are published in AIPs as CDRs usable on ATC instructions only.
-
Flights
will be re-routed on CDRs 3 on ATC instructions as short notice routing proposals.
4.5
An example of publication in AIP of the three categories
of CDRs is given in Annex 1.
4.6
Details of the availability, conditions and use of CDRs 2 in the ECAC area will be published daily in the “Conditional Route Avail-
ability Message”
(CRAM) and disseminated to operators for flight planning purposes.
5.
Area Control Centre (ACC)/Flow Management Position (FMP) - CDR Requests
5.1
Requests for CDRs 2 will normally be based on capacity shortfalls identified in the pre-tactical ATFM Phase.
5.2
The Flow Management
Positions (FMPs) and the associated Area Control Centres (ACCs) in co-ordination with the CFMU will
assess the expected traffic forecast for the next day, highlight
areas of insufficient ATC capacity and agree to the requirement for
Traffic flow adjustment requests.
5.3
As a result of this pre-tactical ATFM co-ordination process, and after consideration of all other relevant ACC factors, the FMPs/
ACCs, as Approved Agencies
(AAs), will submit, on the day before operations, a request for the activation of CDRs 2 to the AMC.
6.
Temporary Segregated Areas (TSAs)
6.1
“Temporary Segregated
Areas” (TSAs) are airspace of pre-defined dimensions within which activities require the
reservation
of
airspace for the exclusive use of specific users during
a determined period of time. TSAs permit activities requiring temporary
reservation to be allocated on the day before operations. This allows the AMC to make available, if required, CDRs outside the
planned hours of associated TSAs.
6.2
The TSA Concept encompasses all airspace reservations (TSAs) and restrictions (Restricted or Danger
Areas) that are managed
and allocated the day before operations by the AMC. They are identified as “AMC-Manageable
Areas” in the relevant part of AIP.
Any remaining
Danger, Restricted and Prohibited Areas that are not suitable for AMC management, remain unaltered in the AIP.
6.3
An example of publication in the AIP (or where appropriate) of TSAs and AMC-Manageable
Restricted & Danger Areas is given
in Annex 2
.
6.4
The planned activity and conditions for the use of TSAs and AMC-Manageable
Danger or Restricted Areas will be published daily
in the national “Airspace Use Plans” (AUPs).
7.
New Airspace-Use Planning Procedures - Approved Agencies (AAs)
7.1
National authority concerned will authorise units, known as Approved Agencies
(AAs), to utilise TSAs or AMC-Manageable Re-
stricted and Danger
areas.

 
DENMARK
AIC A-14/95 - Page 3
DANMARK
7 DEC
7.2
AAs are required by States to submit airspace requests to the AMC for airspace utilisation and allocation in order to perform their
operations with the required safety. AAs are required to:
-
plan their airspace-use activities in advance so as to be able to notify their airspace needs to the AMCs on the day before
the activity;
-
submit to the AMC, on the day before the proposed activity (D -1), requests for airspace utilisation and allocation;
-
make use, on the day of the activity, of the airspace in accordance with the AMC's airspace allocation;
-
cancel through
the AMC, any airspace allocation which, on the day of the activity, is no longer required and advise, if re-
quired, the relevant ACC accordingly
.
7.3
TSA requests could be presented as a block of airspace required during
a specified period of time with the possibility of adapting
the request in time and flight level.
7.4
Any sub-division of TSAs should be related to the activity concerned.
7.5
TSA requests should cover the 24H period of time between
06.00 UTC
the next day to
06.00 UTC
the day after (D 0600hrs to D+1
0600hrs).
8.
Airspace Management Cell (AMC) - Airspace Use Plan (AUP) & Updates (UUPs)
8.1
A joint civil/military Airspace Management
Cell (AMC) will be established to conduct the day-to-day management and temporary
allocation of national airspace according
to user requirements (see Annex 3).
8.2
Approved Agencies
(AAs) responsible for airspace activities will submit requests for allocation of airspace (TSAs) or routes
(CDRs) to the AMC the day before operations.
8.3
After the AMC has received, evaluated and de-conflicted the airspace requests, the notification of the airspace allocation (CDRs,
TSAs, ...) will be published in a daily Airspace Use Plan (AUP). The AUP will be published before 14.00 UTC to cover the 24 hours
time period between 06.00 UTC the next day to 06.00 UTC the day after. An example of AUP is
given in Annex 4.
8.4
Airspace allocated in the current AUP that is cancelled on the day of activity, will be subject of reallocation by the AMC through
an Updated Airspace Use Plan (UUP), promulgated
by 09.00 UTC on the day of operation, to cover the 18 hours time period be-
tween 12.00 UTC that day to 06.00 UTC the following
day.
8.5
The AUPs will only be transmitted to AAs, including
ACCs/FMPs, to the CADF, to adjacent AMCs and to such internal national
agencies
as agreed. As national AUPs will not be sent to AOs, the information provided by AMCs on CDRs 2 availability in the
ECAC area will be disseminated by the CFMU/CADF in a consolidated international message,
the CRAM.
9.
Centralised Airspace Data Function (CADF) - Conditional Route Availability Message (CRAM)
9.1
The CADF is an ASM function established in the CFMU by the ECAC States to collect the information on CDRs from AMCs, to
detect any lack of continuity in CDRs arising
from the different AUPs, and to compile the daily CRAM on CDRs 2 availability within
the ECAC area.
9.2
In order to permit operators to process the CRAM in the most efficient way, the list of available CDRs 2 in the ECAC area can be
divided into
groups e.g. by region or FIR.
9.3
The list of available CDRs 2 by region
will contain the region name followed by the list of available CDRs 2 in the region for the
validity period of the CRAM. When there are no CDRs 2 made available in a
given region, this region name will not appear in the
CRAM.
9.4
The CRAM will contain the list of available CDRs 2 and additionally, when applicable, information on foreseen period(s) of non-
availability of CDRs 1. The CRAM will cover the 24 hours time period between
06.00 UTC
the next day to
06.00 UTC
the day after
(D 0600hrs to D+1 0600hrs). An example of the CRAM is
given in Annex 5.
9.5
The CRAM will be issued by the CADF each day by
15.00 UTC
before or simultaneously with the “ATFM Notification Message”
(ANM) to AOs, ACCs/FMPs concerned, all AMCs and selected AROs on behalf of all ECAC States.
10.
Flight Planning Procedures
10.1
In order to take advantage
of available CDRs, Aircraft Operators are invited to submit their flight plans in accordance with the
following
procedures.
10.2
CDRs 1
will be plannable in the same way as permanent ATS routes during
the times published in AIPs, either using FPL or RPL.
Any foreseen period of non-availability of CDRs 1 will, whenever practicable, be published in the national AUPs for ACC informa-
tion and notified to the operators by the CRAM. In the event of a short notice unavailability of a CDR 1, flights
will be instructed
by ATC to use alternative routes. Operators should consider the implications of the possible use of the alternate ATS routes pub-
lished for each CDR 1 in the “Remarks column” of the AIP
(see Annex 1).
10.3
CDRs 2
availability information in the daily CRAM may be used by Aircraft Operators for flight planning purposes. Aircraft Oper-
ators are also invited to refer to national AIPs and to the daily ANM for additional information regarding
the specific utilisation of
available CDRs 2. Flights
on CDRs 2 can only be flight planned when the CDRs are made available. Therefore, CDRs 2 cannot
be planned in RPLs. Whenever an operator wishes to take advantage
of particular available CDR(s) 2, the relevant RPL shall be
cancelled for the flight(s)
concerned and an individual flight plan shall be submitted including, in the route field 15, the available
CDR(s) 2 to be followed.
10.4
The operator shall ensure that the latest flight
plan information, including route changes and the use of CDRs 2, pertaining to a
particular flight
and duly notified to the appropriate agencies through the “Integrated Initial Flight Plan Processing System” (IFPS),
is made available to the pilot-in-command.
10.5
CDRs 3
will be published in AIPs as CDRs that are usable on ATC instructions only. Therefore, flights
cannot be planned in ad-
vance on CDRs 3, but can only be planned on the permanent ATS route network around the associated “AMC-Manageable
Areas”.
When activity in the associated area will permit, the controller may offer an aircraft a short-notice routing
through the Area using
a pre-defined CDR 3.

 
AIC A-14/95 - Page 4
DENMARK
7 DEC
DANMARK
11.
Publication of CDRs and TSAs with effect from 28 March 1996
11.1
AIRAC date
1 February 1996
will be the common publication date for all new CDRs, TSAs and other AMC-Manageable Areas
that will be used from the start of Phase 1 Implementation of the FUA Concept, and with effect from 28 March 1996.
12.
Further Information
12.1
Further information on the FUA Concept can be obtained:
-
from Civil Aviation Administration, ATM and Procedures
TEL + 45 3644 4848, ext. 477 - FAX + 45 3644 0303
-
and from EUROCONTROL Agency
Airspace Division (DED 4)
TEL + 32 2 729, 33 81, 3382 or 3383 - FAX + 32 2 729 90 03
List of Abbreviations
AA
Approved Agency
ACC
Area Control Centre
AIP
Aeronautical Information Publication
AIRAC
Aeronautical Information Regulation
and Control
AMC
Airspace Management
Cell
ANM
ATFM Notification Message
AO
Aircraft Operator
ARO
Air Traffic Services Reporting
Office
ASM
Airspace Management
ATC
Air Traffic Control
ATFM
Air Traffic Flow Management
ATS
Air Traffic Services
AUP
Airspace Use Plan
CADF
Centralised Airspace Data Function
CDR
Conditional Route
CFMU
Central Flow Management
Unit
CRAM
CDR Availability Message
D
Danger
Area
EATCHIP
European ATC Harmonisation and Integration
Programme
ECAC
European Civil Aviation Conference
FMP
Flow Management
Position
FPL
Filed Flight
Plan
FUA
Flexible Use of Airspace
GAT
General Air Traffic
IFPS
Integrated
Initial Flight Plan Processing System
OAT
Operational Air Traffic
R
Restricted Area
RNAV
Area Navigation
RPL
Repetitive Flight
Plan
TSA
Temporary Segregated
Area
UTC
Co-ordinated Universal Time
UUP
Updated Airspace Use Plan

DENMARK
AIC A-14/95 - Page 5
DANMARK
7 DEC

AIC A-14/95 - Page 6
DENMARK
7 DEC
DANMARK

DENMARK
AIC A-14/95 - Page 7
DANMARK
7 DEC

AIC A-14/95 - Page 8
DENMARK
7 DEC
DANMARK

DENMARK
AIC A-14/95 - Page 9
DANMARK
7 DEC

AIC A-14/95 - Page 10
DENMARK
7 DEC
DANMARK

DENMARK
AIC A-14/95 - Page 11
DANMARK
7 DEC

AIC A-14/95 - Page 12
DENMARK
7 DEC
DANMARK

Back to top